http://www.rottentomatoes.com/features/ ... id=1168260
This really saddens me.

![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
Number 23 comes in at 90....
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Number 23 comes in at 90....As the worst of the worst!
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/features/ ... id=1168260 This really saddens me. ![]() ![]() One person's craziness, is another person's reality. ~ Tim Burton
I know! I seen something on TV, where they said The Number 23 came in at number 2 as the top 5 worst movies! This was also by Rotten Tomatoes. But I don't care what they say, I'm still going to watch it when it comes out on DVD.
![]() ![]() One person's craziness, is another person's reality. ~ Tim Burton
Well rotten tomatoes don't know what their talking about! The Number 23 was good, and no stupid list is gonna change my mind!
![]() "No time outs. Only DEATH!"
"I don't like to brag and I won't cuz I don't have to!" ![]()
sorry but I agree with Rotten Tomatoes. It could have been way better than it turned out. But the only movie that's really at the worst of the worst was Me, Myself & Irene. That one really sucked.
I was thinking that maybe they wrote that article because they're not used to seeing Jim in this sort of role. What do you all think?
A.S.C
![]()
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to (2007) The Number 23 Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests | |
![]() | ![]() |